This newsletter is created in html. It should be viewed while connected to the internet. If your email system does not support html, you see strange characters, or you do not see the photos, click here To view in your browser, copy and paste the following link to your address line: | |||||
|
Holding Aviation to a HIGHER STANDARD™
May 2008 ISSN: 1930-0131
| |||||
|
The grass mowing job is a 12 hour ordeal so you can see that this quickly consumes most of our time. We have also been fighting minor illnesses and injuries all spring so we are doing our best to be sure you have a flying destination. Therefore, we have been very, very slow at getting out this edition. But, to compensate you'll find that this edition is a little longer than normal so that you can savor it over several days.
We hope that you enjoy your Memorial Day and have a great time at a
picnic or fly-in, watching the Indianapolis 500, or spending time with
your family. But, also please take a few minutes to remember those
that died in our country's service. | |||||
|
Historic Stearman Takes Flight
Larry Tobin and his C3B Stearman took to the air this past weekend for the aircrafts first flight after an extensive restoration. In the process, Larry says the C3B became the oldest flying Stearman in existence. Congratulation goes out to Larry and all those who helped in the restoration. Spokane is also home to Addison Pemberton’s Boeing Model 40 which recently took flight to become the oldest flying Boeing. This fall Larry, Addison, and Ben Scott will recreate a coast to coast air mail flight that is sure to attract crowds everywhere they land. We’ll have more for you on that when it draws near.
The latest report from Addison Pemberton in Spokane: "For the
first time in 70 years the NC3440 call sign was used to launch SN 104 sky
ward. The airplane flies like a dream with wonderful harmonized controls
and pleasant stick forces. Ground roll is less than 10 seconds with a
spirited 1100 FPM climb. The stability and ground handling of this great
airplane are truly excellent. Larry Tobin and my son Ryan have done a
notable job of restoration on this historic treasure. This is one of the
most pleasant biplanes I have ever flown!!! Lloyd Stearman really had
this figured out. During the test hop, my boys flying chase commented
that the airplane appeared to be suspended by strings against the blue
sky. " | |||||
|
Serial # 104
Purchased from Skeeter Carlson, a Spokane area legend in 2006.
| |||||
|
Wood, Fabric, & Tailwheels Fly-In This year’s fly-in is only five months away and our website is fully loaded with options for you to make your plans. Whether you want hotel rooms, shuttles, tickets, or whatever, you will find almost everything you could want on there. Many of the hotels rooms are already sold so be sure to make your reservations soon for a fly-in that is shaping up to be a lot of fun.
We hope you will join us this year to laugh in the face of fuel prices and have one heck of time.
For now, take a look around the website and start making your plans. CLICK HERE | |||||
|
Photo by Gilles Auliard
Antique Collector, restorer, and enthusiast extraordinaire Denny Trone was recently killed in his homebuilt replica Dormoy Bathtub.
Denny was the kind of aviation collector that aviation needed before we knew we did. He started chasing rare aircraft long before anyone thought they were worth saving. In fact, he started collecting when most people didn’t think they were even worth five minutes and a cup of gasoline to put them out of their misery with a bonfire.
I only met Denny one time but I’ll never forget it. The parts and projects he showed us and his willingness to share his stories provided the perfect end to an evening of antique flying. Despite it being late, he took time to let us see much of what he had found and saved from pre-WWI through the early 30’s. All of which would surely have long disappeared if it weren’t for him.
Right now I know several people who are about to put one of a kind airplanes back into the air because Denny provided them with the one part they needed to make it happen. Denny was a person who believed planes should be flown and he never stopped adding flying machines to the air. This man deserves chapters, not articles, and I hope someone got all his stories down on paper. He will be missed. | |||||
|
On the second Sunday of June, July, and August the two of us and an ever growing number of necessary volunteers make homemade milkshakes and sundaes for those looking for a different kind of aviation get together. If you want a good excuse to cheat on that diet, come see us.
Originally expected to draw ten, last year’s Sinful Sundays averaged around 60 aircraft each month. With that kind of record, you might be surprised to find out we almost cancelled these events this year. The problem is they have become so successful that we cannot handle them without more volunteers. Somehow though, Rich talked Ginger into one more year and then he's on his own for finding soda jerks.
If you or perhaps your group could spend a couple hours helping us on the event day, please let us know by signing up. CLICK HERE
| |||||
|
What kind of a statement on the Warbird Community is it that letting people sit in the cockpit of a P-51 is so unheard of that the family who does this makes it into every magazine and group email known to aviation?
Now don’t misunderstand me, I think what Bill and Scott Yoak are doing with their P-51, Quick Silver, is an absolutely wonderful thing and also well worthy of publication and praise. Yet, the reason their story is so amazing is that it is so out of the ordinary. This is what the magazine articles refuse to say but are trying to imply by rewarding them with all the press?
With that said you might be surprised to find that I think it is perfectly ok for owners to refuse visitors in their cockpits, with one condition. Here it is; if owners of warbirds are only in it for the ego trip, what it does for their manhood, or because they really want and can afford a cool toy but don’t want to share it with anyone that’s fine. Really it is. Some people are just that way with their toys; everyone is different. But what’s not ok is when that same guy recites the same old worn out, canned, sentimental story about how important it is to preserve these planes so that they can be shared with future generations…blah blah blah…the looks on veteran’s faces…blah blah blah…our country’s history yadda yadda yadda…while never having the time to talk to or let big kids, little kids, or teary eyed veterans sit in the plane. If someone really believed this story, they would not park the plane in a roped off area, walk away, and only come back to fly it in the airshow to earn their free gas. They would instead bring a chair, sit with the machine, and share the plane with all those interested. What do you think?
A few years back I was at an antique type club event where those in attendance were lamenting the lack of a new generation of antique pilots with long winded speeches and discussion. A friend stood up after he couldn't take it any more and said, “It’s no wonder; all your planes are parked and there’s still an hour of daylight and people all over the field who would love to go for a ride”. ‘Nuff said….
------------------------------------------------------------------------ A note from Ginger: When flying one of the CAF's PT-26's to airshows in the Midwest area, I used to heave every kid into the bird that I could get into it. Often there was a line that seemed to be a mile long just to sit in the plane. Many times, other wing members would criticize me for doing so but the organization was formed as a "flying museum". To me, this meant getting more people involved and interested - especially the younger kids. While the kids were sitting in the plane, I attempted to tell them about the plane and what it was used for during WWII. I was amazed at the number of kids that knew nothing about WWII . . . They had never even heard of it. But I was determined that as long as I was there, when they got out of the plane they would know something of our American history. Furthermore much of what I taught, I had learned a from those guys (and gals) that originally flew these planes.
| |||||
|
Negative News, High Fuel Prices, & Government Regulation Getting You Down?
Once you are out there cleaning the plane getting it ready for the warm Summer months and your mind starts to drift toward the subject of fuel prices, a few of you may choose to do the math to see that current fuel prices don’t make that big of a difference to the cost of flying; but I'm sure that’s not the majority.
So for the rest of you try this instead; if fuel prices are tempting you to fly less, then choose to make the most of you time in the air. By making the most of your time, I mean that there are hundreds or thousands of events being held around the country by hundreds of organizations in order to give you something to do with your plane. These events are always a great way to reconnect with aviation and the pilots in your region and they do wonders for your spirits and outlook on the sport as a whole. If you truly are restricted by fuel prices, then by planning your flights and using them to visit events, I think you will find the level of quality time with your plane increases along with your spirits.
| |||||
|
Cirrus From EAA?
I seriously doubt that the give away attracts enough new members, if any, or retains enough to warrant the high cost of such a machine. The only possibility is that it was a gift from someone who does not know how best to spend their money. Although I am a big fan of what Cirrus has done for aviation, the give away plane is no place for it. What needs to be on the give away list are twelve Fly Baby’s; one for each month.
This makes
sense as these planes would be of use to the majority of members as I
truly wonder how many members could afford to even keep the Cirrus (pay
the taxes) if they won. Heck, for the price of one Cirrus, EAA could
give away fifty Fly Babies. Now imagine them all painted with a
beautiful crimson and ivory EAA paint scheme and you have fifty flying
advertisements for EAA that are affordable and easy to maintain. | |||||
|
Photographers at Lee Bottom
The first one out of the hat is Gilles Auliard.
Born when and where? You currently live where? Born 1958 in Chateauroux (France), living in Newington, CT
Do you do something else besides photography? Is photography your primary or second job/business? - What is first or second if you have two? Owner/operator of an environmental laboratory. Photography is my 3rd wife (the most expensive of them all).
What got you interested in aviation? My mother had entrance to the old Chateauroux-Deols Air Base, the #1 depot of the USAFE at the end of the 50s/60s. There, I could see all the planes coming and going, until De Gaulle kicked the American out of France (pure Joan of Arc style).
What got you interested in photography? Started taking pictures of these planes with a Russian camera, and got arrested for spying at age 15. Had crossed from the civilian side of the airport at Tours Air Base towards the military base, and was standing by the runway without any authorization. Had the film confiscated and spent the night in jail before being released. Learned my lesson, and always asked in advance form that point on.
Is there one shoot that stands out in your head as the most memorable and why? The best shoot is always the last one, and in this case, the Boeing 40. Addsion was contacted by a bunch of magazines who wanted to come and take the first air-to-air, but he stuck by his gun, and I was numero uno, as he had promised many years prior.
What would you like to photograph that you haven't? I pretty much have succeeded in taking pictures of anything I could think of. I feel the need to do something, and it happens. Don't ask me how, I don't know. . .
What is the most difficult thing about being an aviation photographer? The most difficult is dealing with other photographers whose egos are inadvertently proportional to their abilities.
What is your favorite aircraft? If it's a P-51 also name your second most favorite aircraft. My favorite airplane is the Waco 10, for God only knows what reason (Maybe because I will never fly one)
Within what magazines and or publications have your photos appeared or been featured? Cannot really make a list, but it is about 50 in 10 different countries and in five languages.
Do you do other forms of media such as video? No other format, difficult enough not to miss anything with cameras.
What equipment do you use? All Canon, and for over 30 years. Never had any problem with it. My first Canon was offered to me by my mother for my high school graduation. As for the Russian camera, I bought it at 12 with my allowance, it was the only SLR I could afford at the time, it was a real tank, and a piss poor camera, but I did not know better at the time, and had nobody to ask questions to.
Do you have a website and what is it? No time for a website, but Googling my name will bring hordes of pictures and excerpts of articles.
What did you like best about Lee Bottom? I am a grass roots guy, I do not like big gatherings. I would rather sit my ass in a Cub with a buddy than watching the latest and greatest weapon passing by in a crowds of 100,000 -or 80 P-51s-. I think that what I loved the most at Lee Bottom. Just plain Joes flying their planes and enjoy a day in the sun without any rules but self imposed ones.
What photograph, taken by yourself, is your favorite and can we print it with your answers? My favorite is the Ryan STM over the cornfield at Brodhead. It is the closest I ever came to perfection. Everything is there, exposure, attitude, complementary colors. A good surprise knowing that it was a hit and run, as the plane was going home, and we tagged along for 15 minutes.
| |||||
|
Do You Remember What It Is That You
Love About Flying
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A note from Ginger: I'm pretty sure this article was written for
me. You see, due to a really bad case of aviation burnout, I've
given up flying and dropped my membership to aviation clubs. I
will have to admit that Rich's attempt is better than most. Some
of the comments
from others who have heard the story: "Hope you get over it soon",
"Maybe you're time to fly is over", or the lack of a response all
together. I would recommend that the aviation groups work on ways
to retain existing pilots and to keep them actively flying. Can't
say as though I've seen a Project Mentor or a Young Eagle's program to
address what appears to be a huge problem in keeping the pilot
population active and involved. | |||||
|
Where have you seen Lee Bottom Apparel?
Don Weber was recently spotted at the Western Wall of Prayer in Israel. Look closely
and you'll see that is a Lee Bottom logo T Shirt that he is wearing. |
|||||
|
Lee Bottom
"Where Old Planes Go To Fly™"
While skimming over the latest article about the Pemberton’s Model 40 in GA News, it was discussed where they planned to visit with it over the summer. Listed in the article was Oshkosh, Brodhead, and Blakesburg “Where Old Planes Go to Fly”. There it was. Did you see it? “Where Old Planes Go To Fly” is clearly our trademarked slogan being associated with Blakesburg.
Mistakes like
this are a little too common in today’s professional publications but
there is little you can do about it and often little you would want to
do about it. We’ve spent years getting people to associate our airport
with that slogan and that is why we trademarked it. Yet, we are not
upset. We are used to these things happening and who could complain when
your ideas are so easily placed next to Blakesburg, the home of The
Antique Aircraft Association? | |||||
|
Economy woe: Real or Imagined
takes
toll on aircraft values
Much like homes in Southern Florida, just because three people in a row paid a 30% premium for an aircraft, that doesn’t mean that it is or was ever worth what the last guy shelled out. Furthermore, just like the housing market, you should buy a plane you really want and plan to keep it and enjoy it as the value steadily goes up over time. Whenever people try to jump ahead of this curve or buy for investment purposes, they commonly get burned by tough corrections.
This can be seen in many places in the aircraft market. Two such recent examples are a recent Stearman restoration with new engine, overhauled prop, radio, transponder, electrical system, etc that when put up for sale on Ebay and stopped at $68,000 and a RNF Waco with an immaculate very recent restoration, newly restored engine, newly overhauled prop, new wood wings, etc that only made it to $51,000.
If you are being affected by such corrections, you should not be depressed. Instead, give yourself an honest gut check and try to determine if it is at all possible that you have experienced some wishful thinking in the past and tricked yourself into believing your plane to be worth more that what it truly is. If this is the case, and if you are the one person in one hundred willing to admit this, then you have two options; you can sell the plane for what it will bring to someone who will enjoy and fly it or you can keep it and get back to flying and enjoying it like you used to before you became so worried about scratching and thus reducing the value of that multi-million dollar J-3.
In other words, get back to enjoying the freedom of flight. I think you
will find your plane brings many more smiles to you in the air than if
buried in an investment portfolio. | |||||
|
EAA editorials
Let me remind
you that planes like this are a dime a dozen so let me ask you this; if
people are trying to get into aviation cheaply, why would they pay
$88,900 for a new one when they could get one almost as good as new for
less than a third the price? Well, I can tell you. The people who buy
the new ones are not the people who need something to be cheap to get
into it. But Tom has heard it all so he tries to cover this base also.
If we really wanted or needed new pilots and cheap aircraft, wouldn’t we have fought hard to have those included? Let’s see, cheap planes that actually exist right now vs. hypothetical aircraft that will be bought in hypothetical numbers, by hypothetical flight schools, and then sold at ridiculously cheap hypothetical prices fifteen years down the road? COME ON…GIVE ME A BREAK!
And while I’m at it, how many of you know what it takes to repair damage to a composite aircraft? I’m not talking scratches, I’m talking holes, cuts, whatever. There are very few people or places that can do this properly so that the original strength of the design is retained. On the other hand, nearly every home builder in the world could patch up a Cessna 150 or Aeronca Champ properly and inexpensively. Am I missing something?
Oh man, I
forgot about Dave’s editorial. OK here’s what I’m going to do. I’ll cut
it down to one relatively small paragraph. Dave says he tired of listening to people complain about the divisions at EAA. This is sad and I think he needs correction to his direction. EAA is a little too much like our government these days and seems to believe the members are there to serve it and not the other way around. If he meant that he is tired of all the divisiveness and wish everyone would come together on their commonalities, I agree but stress that he should look only inward. EAA as an organization is for all practical purposes, like most groups, nothing more than a magazine and a fly-in (how many members are members for the magazine?). The chapters on the other hand are where all the life is. These small pockets of aviators and builders are much if not most of the life of aviation in the US. They need more from EAA and not the other way around. Furthermore, if Dave wants to see divisions, how about those caused by continuing to keep Sport Aviation, IAC, Warbirds, Vintage, and NAFI separate. More often than not, important things are happening to one or more of these groups that the members of the others are not aware of because they are kept separate to boost revenue from membership and advertising fees. Take a look around Oshkosh some time. The Warbirds are here, Vintage there, Ultralight over yonder, and each day of the event brings yet another sub-event put together for members of yet even smaller groups. Heck it’s quite easy to go to Oshkosh and never see or talk to anyone but the same people you see or talk to when home. Divisiveness breeds divisiveness. One last thing; if members are complaining - listen. Don't complain that you are having to deal with all these people. Perhaps the people that pay your salary feel they need to complain.
| |||||
|
Low Cost Flying
We’re glad they are listening but strangely, every plane they mentioned that was to be on display was a certified airplane. It seems that someone at EAA has decided to move quietly away from experimental aircraft, or at least those that don’t pay advertising. Van’s provides pages of advertising but Pietenpohls built from scratch? Yet as mentioned earlier, EAA claims to believe cost is the number one reason keeping people out of aviation.
Ten thousand dollar aircraft that are fun, inexpensive to operate, and experimental are everywhere but when low cost flying comes to mind for EAA, they immediately think, “What’s cheap that is certified?” Again, we’re glad you are listening but please don’t screw this up. Ask around and fill that area with Experimental Aircraft with signs that say “Purchased for $9500”, “Bought last month for $8900”, “Under $50 per hour to operate”, “Small enough to share hangar space”, “In the air for $10,000”; I think you get the picture.
IF you can’t find the very airplane you can put small print under it that says “Reflects recent purchase price of similar aircraft”. Then to top it all off, park a See Doo next to one of them with a sign that says “Airplane $9500, See Doo $9500 – five years later same Airplane value $9500, same See Doo value $3000. Or how about, “This plane cheaper than all these” and next to it place a Harley, See Doo, some brand of new small boat, a set of new titanium golf clubs and a years worth of Golf Course and Membership Fees, and a zero radius mower.
See, this is how marketing works. There will be, according to EAA, half the population of planet Earth at Airventure and no doubt some of them will be trying to convince themselves or their spouses to let them get a plane. Combine an interested somewhat captive market with actual marketing and you might be amazed. We won’t even charge you for the ideas…until September. | |||||
|
Oshkosh Costs Soooo Much The other day I was talking to someone who was planning to bring several new people to our fly-in event in September when he said “It’s amazing how quickly your event has grown. Before long you’ll be larger than (several fly-in’s names here)”. This statement was made at the beginning of a conversation that eventually led to the same old complaints about Oshkosh and high prices and it carried with it a tremendous amount of dread for me. This ever present complaint is something I’ve always considered one of the greatest examples of how humans, and even more specifically pilots, think. Sadly and admittedly I’m one of them.
People always get excited to go to large events. Large events are considered more credible, useful, and worthwhile to the pilot community. Large events bring a wider range of people together, more aircraft, and the more potential. Yet as soon as an event gets “large”, attendees start complaining about prices. This is what brought the dread into my life. Build them up, tear them down.
One of my strongest and longest held beliefs is “Grow or Die”. Basically, there two directions available to anything and everything on the planet be it object, creature, or process. These are grow (forward) or die (backward). That is why we continue to move forward with our event despite the continuous stream of obstacles that get in the way. This is also why we question so many status quo ideas because standing still counts as dying or moving backward. Do you see where the dread is? Well, our dread is that as the event continues to grow, our point on the bell curve will change and people will begin to complain about it being big because that’s what you do when an event gets big. Do you see where I am going with this? No? Let me explain.
For several years in a row now, I have visited Oshkosh and in the process witnessed one of the most amazing spectacles of organization and choreography on the planet. You would be hard pressed to find bigger events, with more people crammed together, and more movements of machinery in one week while simultaneously providing sanitation, food, entertainment, and the most spotless grounds anywhere in the world. It truly is amazing. This is why I don’t understand the complaints.
All my life I have understood that if you want to go to the biggest party, you’re going to spend the biggest bucks. That’s how it works. So why do aviation people not get it? The irony here is that the human desire to go to the biggest party is what makes it so expensive. So what’s the option? Well, you could quit going and it would stop moving forward and would die. OR you could keep going and pay the price because you want to go to the biggest party and thus allow the event to move forward. Now don’t get me wrong. I understand the dollars spent can add up quickly. But your only options are to look for the bloating (see note below labeled 40%) and inefficiencies that creep into organizations over time and insist they be corrected to insure the best is being made of your money spent.
So in case you missed it, here’s the synopsis; having put on our fly-in during the past 11 years, I have come to understand the amazing amount of money, planning, and money it takes to do so. My understanding of what it takes to make everything happen the way it should and safely has grown immensely since Ginger arrived and started making it happen here. There is so much required to make The Wood, Fabric, & Tailwheels Fly-In happen that I cannot imagine how much goes into Oshkosh….sorry, Airventure.
So next time you are drinking that multi-dollar ice cold Coke, remember that it had to arrive via extra shipments coordinated weeks or months in advance, had to be purchased by vendors who pay a percentage to your organization, then sold by a surge of part time employees, from a stand driven in and set up for the week, connected to provided power, hooked to phone lines, likely checked by the health department and fire marshal, and dispensed into cups that came from extra shipments, with ice that was accumulated for weeks made far away and driven in, and when consumed it is thrown into one of the thousands of trash receptacles provided that are dumped several times a day and driven miles away to a landfill. Eventually you need to eliminate this liquid which goes into a port-a-pot that was trucked in and cleaned as frequently as possible to keep the stench minimized. And that’s just your Coke.
Note referenced above: While visiting a local EAA chapter the other night, one of our friends told us the story of applying to Airventure to sell one of his books there. Someone had suggested it to him, he had filled out the paperwork, and received a letter stating that he was accepted and would be allowed to sell his book. I believe in the EAA shop. Yet although he has some great stories and books that everyone should read, he has decided to not take EAA up on their offer. Why? Well they wanted 40% of his net!!! FORTY PERCENT OF HIS NET!!! These are the kind of things that people are tired of and quite honestly find truly offensive.
| |||||
|
Where were you
at 40?
Unfortunately, the weather that plagued the fly-in also took its toll on
him. Four days later, and many short flights later, Rich pulled up to
Jim Clevenger’s hangar for some lunch and a tour of the airport. Along
the way he met Ray Coker who helped him out in Conroe, Texas, spent his
40th birthday in a hotel room in Gulf Shores eating junk food from a
nearby gas station, watched the next day pass while waiting out
the
weather with a great couple from Wisconsin and a guy in a Ercoupe trying
to get to Lakeland,
Then after all that, when he finally made it to his destination, he had only enough time for a quick tour of the adjacent hangars before making a mad dash for home. Oh well, here are some photos from his interesting 40th birthday trip. By the way, he still says the Bearhawk never disappoints and recommends it to anyone interested in such a machine. www.BearhawkAircraft.com | |||||
|
Where Are We Heading? I think everyone would agree that our current President’s administration
is pushing many ridiculous proposals down the throats of U S Citizens.
No matter what you think of the President, good or bad, I’m pretty sure
it is safe to say that there is something he is or has pushed that you
find utterly ridiculous or unbelievable. WOW, isn’t that interesting?!?!?! Let me make sure I got that right…yep,
that’s right. For a minute there I thought I may have mistakenly copied
the line from Cuban complaints about Cuba but this is right and it does
come from our US Government. And to think we elected these people…. | |||||
|
ANTIQUE AIRCRAFT OWNER IN NEED OF HELP? Right now I’m having some difficulty getting new springs made for the oleo struts to put on a KR-21. I have a drawing, but can’t find anyone to manufacture them. I heard the WACO guys use die springs but I haven’t found any that are 1.75” dia., which is what I need, and I have some reservations about using them as they will most certainly be significantly different from the original design. If you can help this person out, CLICK HERE to let us know and we'll pass the word along.
| |||||
|
The Bad Side of Good A while back I was given the opportunity to see an incredible collection of aircraft stuff that had been scrounged together over many years. Apparently I saw just a small part of it but I have to say that what I laid eyes on was quite interesting. Yet, once again I came away disappointed and unimpressed. I hadn’t been at this place long, maybe two minutes, when I knew everything I needed to know. You see, this collection of stuff belonged to a member of one of the best and worst types of aviation nuts; the “I have it and you don’t” type.
The “I have it and you don’t” type has long been a figure of great confusion to me. The people in this category are always the same. Years ago before anyone thought anything in aviation might have value, they started scrounging Waco air vents, Aeronca brake pucks, and nearly every rare old plane they could buy from some guy for a buck fifty; that’s one dollar and fifty scents. If they found something hidden in a barn that couldn’t be purchased from the owner while practically getting everything else for free, they made a mental note of it and never told anyone else where it was. Today the inevitable community of buildings and hangars these types own are filled with all that stuff they “purchased” and NEVER USED OR EVER WILL.
As if to rub it in, these people always tell everyone about those projects they were unable to acquire minus one important point; where it was. They also always claim that “they would like to give things to a museum” until a museum steps forward to inquire and then it is back to “I have it and you don’t”.
No matter how hard I try, I will never understand these people. It’s obvious they get some sense of power out of knowing where something is and letting you know about it without telling you where it is yet these people usually have no reason or need to feel power as they usually have it somewhere else. Perhaps they are holding on to a dream or their youth but without fail they always hold on to these things or that one important piece of information until it is too late and the projects have lost the value or last fraction of structural integrity. Whatever the case, these items are already as good as gone with the only trace of its existence locked up in someone’s mind. This is why I have no time for these people.
If you follow the logic, they are no friend of aviation nor are they saviors of aircraft. They are merely packrats that happened to collect old planes and parts. There was never any intention of saving the planes, restoring them, or even selling them, just merely some strange wiring in their head that makes them feel important buy keeping something from those that would. If you think I am being too hard on these people, then so be it but I can assure you that at least as many old planes have been lost to these types as were ever saved by them.
After reading this through, I felt I should cover one other possibility; one that I have personally witnessed many times. There actually are a few people out there that fit all the above but want the planes to survive with a good home. Unfortunately, they know most of the people in that long line at the door are only there to kiss up in hopes of a steal or that the future widow will allow them to “handle” the disposition of assets. I guess there will always be predators out there but sometimes aviation seems to have a few too many. This makes it nearly impossible for someone looking to place these aircraft artifacts a good home to make a decision.
How many people do you know like this or are you one of them? I’d like to hear from both categories. If you are one of them, perhaps you could tell us why you continue to hold on to these things or perhaps a story about the endless line of people at your door. Please help me understand.
A friend once said someone needs to point out to these people that there is no power in gold under ground, oil in someone else's tank, and aircraft in someone's mind rusting away in another country.
Note: Aeroplane Monthly Magazine recently reported that four Stearman-Hammond Y-1S Safety Planes arrived in Lelystad, Holldand after being purchased from someone who had them in a barn in Buffalo, New York. This is exactly what I am talking about above. These were planes Lloyd Stearman helped design and build after leaving Stearman Aircraft. Numerous people through the years have expressed desire to find one of these and before anyone could (most people thought all but one were gone) some body came in from overseas and took them away. CLICK HERE to see what we lost.
A few years back Air Classics reported that the RAF museum received a donation from a previous NASM Curator; the one of a kind Miles Aircraft custom built for Charles Lindbergh for his time in England. It was believed by most to have long been destroyed but it had been in the states for nearly 30 years. The RAF Museum plans to let it hang in storage. What's interesting about this is nobody seemed to know it existed and when it arrived at the museum it was announced it was announced it came from a donor in the U.S. Do you see a pattern here? CLICK HERE to see what we lost. | |||||
|
Pilatus Intercepted by F-16
As for the TFR’s I couldn’t agree more but military aircraft in a MOA is something he should have been looking for. As I’ve said before, I go right through MOA's but I also know to keep my eyes on the lookout for rapidly growing specs on the horizon and away from altitudes they will most likely inhabit. I also dream of “attempted” intercepts but like the lottery, they never happen to anyone willing to have fun with them. Yet, there are bigger problems here.
Military pilots and civilian pilots are being divided just like commercial, civilian, medical, business, sport, experimental, and vintage pilots are. This is a bad situation. I have recently spoken with several military pilots, and read online the comments from military pilots who think “little planes” should get out of their way. These comments were said in a manner that implied military planes are primary and civilian secondary. Yet, the reason for having military planes is to protect the rights and freedoms of the “little planes (U.S.citizens)”.
So I have to ask, who is instilling this attitude in our military pilots? Do I think small planes should look out for and possibly give way to military aircraft when prudent, absolutely. But do I think the military should come first and the small planes second, no. I think they should hold the same status and work together. If civilian and military pilots were using their heads to think like a group, they would realize there are pilots in each aircraft, people who value freedom, people who love this country, and people who may just be looking to have a little fun.
I also think it’s time everyone got on the same page. This country
was created for and by the people; not for and by the government. When
established, our country was to have a military to protect the rights
and freedoms of the people, not to serve the wishes of the government.
Period…end of discussion. Yet, as our military has decreased in size,
the amount of airspace it claims has grown, TFR’s have come on the scene
for anything run by someone with political connections, and we have to
worry about drones flying around by someone in a dark room hundreds of
miles away. Meanwhile, we are being made to feel like second class
citizens and told we are unpatriotic. | |||||
|
How come we have to choose from just 2 persons for president, and 50 for Miss America? author unknown | |||||
|
A Pilot Looks at Forty
Well, the answer to that questions is a
few more than you would think with each of those pilots having an
asterisk by their names *Willing to kiss ass to get ahead. But to me,
this deepened my confidence that that one job would seek me out as
everyone knows that just like “there’s no crying in baseball”, “no real
Pilot kisses ass”. So, I kept moving forward knowing that some day,
someone would walk up to me and say “I’ve been looking for you”. Yet,
the convergence of preparation and opportunity I had hoped for never
happened. | |||||
We are guessing that each of you know at least one other pilot that would like to see aviation continue for future generations to enjoy. If you do, NORDO News asks would like you to forward this newsletter to a friend and ask them to Sign-Up. Let's grow our group that is focused on "Holding Aviation to a Higher Standard". Sign up for this FREE e-Pub, click here | |||||
|